Dubai Market Report — June 2026
Volume Cratered but Prices Held — A Liquidity Squeeze, Not a Bust
Data through May 2026·For informational purposes only. Not financial or investment advice.
Bottom Line
Volume Cratered but Prices Held — A Liquidity Squeeze, Not a Bust
March 2026 delivered the sharpest volume contraction in recent memory — transactions fell 33.6% month-on-month to 8,946, dragging total value down 36.5% to AED 18.7B — yet median prices per sqm eased only 1.9% to AED 18,504, still up 5% year-on-year. That divergence is the single most important signal this month: buyers pulled back on activity, not on price expectations. This is a liquidity squeeze, not a pricing correction, and the distinction matters for how investors should position.
The rental side tells a more cautionary story. Median rents dropped 12% month-on-month to AED 1,071 per sqm and are now down 3.6% year-on-year, compressing gross yields by 67 bp to 5.8%. Yields are now 51 bp below where they stood a year ago. For income-focused investors, the margin of safety is narrowing: purchase prices remain elevated while rental income is softening, a combination that punishes leveraged buy-to-let strategies and rewards patient capital that can ride out a rental reset.
Area-level data reinforces the bifurcation. Jumeirah Village Circle logged 2,754 transactions at AED 15,893 per sqm with a 7.2% gross yield — still the market's highest-throughput corridor and the strongest income play by a wide margin. Business Bay maintained premium positioning at AED 27,386 per sqm with a 5.8% yield, while Palm Deira printed 1,572 transactions at AED 30,103 per sqm, signalling sustained appetite for emerging luxury product even amid broad-market caution. Dubai South and Majan each cleared roughly 1,500 transactions at mid-teen pricing, confirming that affordable master-planned communities continue to absorb demand when headline volume contracts.
The thesis heading into Q2 is straightforward: if April transactions recover to within 15–20% of March's already depressed base, the volume dip was calendar-driven and seasonal — a pattern Dubai has printed before. If April stays flat or deteriorates further, the market faces a demand-side problem that even resilient pricing cannot mask indefinitely. Watch the April transaction count as the single print that determines whether March was an outlier or a turning point.
By the Numbers
- •8,946 transactions, -33.6% MoM — June volume plunges by a third from MayThe steepest monthly contraction of 2026 so far signals a sudden liquidity pullback, not a gentle seasonal fade. Whether this reflects Eid timing, regulatory friction, or genuine demand exhaustion will define the H2 outlook.
- •-27.9% YoY transaction decline — annual comparison confirms structural slowdownYear-on-year shrinkage removes any calendar-driven alibi; fewer deals are closing than at the same point last year, suggesting buyer appetite has meaningfully cooled rather than merely shifted between months.
- •AED 18.7B total value, -33% YoY — capital deployed drops by a third annuallyTotal market value fell 36.5% MoM and 33% YoY, meaning both deal count and average ticket size are compressing simultaneously — a pattern that typically precedes broader price discovery to the downside.
- •AED 18,504 per sqm median price, +5% YoY — pricing resilience defies the volume collapsePrices dipped just 1.9% MoM and still sit 5% above June 2025, indicating sellers are rationing supply rather than chasing liquidity. This divergence between price and volume is the central tension to monitor.
- •AED 1,071 per sqm median rent, -12% MoM — rental correction accelerates sharplyA 12% monthly drop and 3.6% annual decline mark the fastest rental softening of 2026, likely driven by new supply handovers finally giving tenants negotiating leverage after years of landlord-dominated renewals.
Price Dynamics
Prices Hold Within 2% of Highs as Volume Retreats
Dubai's residential pricing regime is displaying a classic late-cycle signature: volume is contracting faster than prices are adjusting, which signals liquidity thinning rather than outright correction. When transaction counts drop by double digits but median pricing per square metre barely moves, sellers are holding firm and buyers are stepping back — a pattern that looks stable on the surface but carries latent repricing risk if holding costs mount or sentiment shifts.
The three-year quarterly price trajectory visible in the accompanying chart underscores how structural the appreciation has been. From early 2023 through late 2025, median pricing per square metre climbed in a staircase pattern, each quarter printing modestly above the last, with only brief consolidation pauses. That structural momentum is the reason a single month of modest price softness does not yet constitute a trend break. Two data points — a prior peak and a slight pullback — are a comparison, not a correction. The quarterly lens smooths out exactly the kind of noise that a Ramadan-affected registration month introduces, and it confirms that the broader trajectory remains upward even as monthly figures wobble.
What makes this regime particularly relevant for investors is the divergence across price tiers. Corridors like Majan and Dubai South are trading in the AED 16,100 to AED 16,400 per sqm band, while Palm Deira commands nearly double that. The spread between affordable emerging communities and premium off-plan destinations has widened over the past year, meaning the market is not moving as a monolith — it is bifurcating along a value-versus-prestige axis. Affordable corridors are more sensitive to yield compression because rental softening erodes their primary appeal, while premium destinations derive pricing support from brand positioning and scarcity narratives. Branded residences across the Middle East are seeing sustained demand from ultra-high-net-worth buyers seeking lifestyle-driven ownership5, reinforcing the premium tier's resilience even during volume drawdowns.
The regime diagnosis today is liquidity thinning with price stability — the third of the five canonical volume-price states and historically the most deceptive. It rewards patience over aggression. Buyers in the affordable tier should negotiate harder than headline pricing suggests, because sellers in those corridors face real carrying costs from compressed yields. Buyers targeting premium stock have less leverage; seller conviction there remains high.
The falsifiable watch-item is simple: if the next two months of data show median pricing per square metre declining more than 3% cumulatively while volume stays depressed, the regime shifts from thinning liquidity to active repricing, and defensive positioning becomes warranted. Until that threshold is breached, the structural uptrend visible in the quarterly chart still governs.


Volume Analysis
Volume Contraction Demands a Seasonal Lens Before Drawing Conclusions
The sharp pullback in March transaction volume lands squarely in a period when Ramadan typically suppresses deal registration across Dubai, making the raw month-on-month decline a poor basis for diagnosing structural demand weakness. Seasonal drag from the holy month routinely compresses closings as buyer activity slows and administrative processing thins — a pattern well understood by market participants but easily overstated in headline data. The more informative question is whether the trailing quarterly run rate has deteriorated relative to the prior year, and here the year-on-year comparison still shows a meaningful contraction that cannot be attributed to calendar effects alone.
Composition within the volume pool reveals a market that is concentrating rather than contracting uniformly. Jumeirah Village Circle, Business Bay, Majan, Palm Deira, and Dubai South together absorbed the lion's share of activity, but the character of demand across these corridors differs materially. Jumeirah Village Circle's throughput dominance reflects affordability-driven absorption — high unit counts at accessible price points. Palm Deira, by contrast, generated comparable transaction counts at nearly double the per-square-metre pricing, indicating that capital is flowing simultaneously into value-seeking and premium positioning plays. This bifurcation matters: aggregate volume declines mask the fact that the affordable master-planned segment and the emerging premium waterfront segment are both maintaining deal flow, while the middle tier faces the greatest liquidity risk.
The accompanying 12-month trend chart illustrates the seasonal rhythm clearly — peaks tend to cluster in Q4, while Q1 readings often soften before stabilising through mid-year. Summer months historically see a further contraction as expatriate departures reduce the active buyer pool, meaning the April and May prints will need to demonstrate recovery momentum before the seasonal headwind intensifies again in June through August.
The volume-price dynamic is the critical diagnostic here. Pricing has remained broadly stable even as transaction counts have dropped, which fits the pattern of thinning liquidity rather than active correction. Sellers are holding price expectations, and buyers are stepping back — a configuration that can appear calm on the surface but often precedes price concessions if holding costs mount or new supply forces seller competition. This is the regime that rewards patience over urgency.
Investors focused on near-term deployment should monitor whether Q2 monthly transaction counts recover above the trailing three-month average. If they do not, and if the summer seasonal drag compounds the existing deficit, the liquidity-thinning diagnosis strengthens and favours buyers who can negotiate below listed pricing. If April and May volumes rebound meaningfully, the March dip was calendar noise — watch that two-month sequence as the single most important near-term signal.


Supply Pipeline
Pipeline Composition Favours Off-Plan Absorption, but Geographic Concentration…
Dubai's forward supply picture demands attention not for its aggregate size but for where incoming inventory is landing. The corridors absorbing the most off-plan launches overlap heavily with the areas already processing the highest transaction volumes, creating a feedback loop that could tip from healthy absorption into localised oversupply if demand momentum softens further.
The affordable master-planned communities — particularly those in the mid-teen pricing band — are where developer activity is most aggressive. These corridors attract first-time buyers and yield-seeking investors precisely because entry prices sit well below premium waterfront or downtown benchmarks, and developers have responded by concentrating new project launches in these zones. The risk is straightforward: if absorption rates in these corridors slow while pipeline deliveries continue on schedule, the supply-demand balance tilts against sellers, compressing both resale premiums and rental yields. Current gross yields in several of these areas remain above the marketwide level, but that premium is partly a function of limited standing inventory — a condition that new completions will erode.
Geographic concentration is the core vulnerability. When a disproportionate share of upcoming units targets a narrow set of corridors, even robust citywide demand cannot prevent pockets of price pressure. Investors underwriting entry in pipeline-heavy locations should stress-test assumptions against a scenario where local supply doubles within a two-to-three-year window while demand grows at a slower pace than the current cycle's peak rates.
The trend chart illustrates how off-plan transaction volume has evolved, and the visual reinforces a critical point: off-plan activity has been elevated relative to historical norms for several consecutive periods, meaning the units transacted during the recent boom are now entering the construction-to-delivery conveyor. The pressure from these units will materialise not immediately but progressively as handover dates arrive.
Data on the precise delivery year distribution is limited in the current dataset, so any claim about front-loaded versus back-loaded timing would be speculative. What is observable is that the vast majority of pipeline projects remain under construction rather than near completion, suggesting the heaviest wave of new inventory has not yet hit the market. That distinction matters: it means the current pricing regime has a window of relative insulation, but it also means the eventual supply impact is still ahead rather than behind.
Investors targeting pipeline-heavy corridors should favour units with near-term completion dates where rental income can begin quickly, hedging against the possibility that later tranches deliver into a softer market. If Q2 and Q3 off-plan registration volumes remain within 10% of their trailing six-month average, the market is absorbing comfortably. A sustained spike above that range — particularly concentrated in two or three corridors — would be the early signal that localised oversupply risk is escalating from theoretical to actionable.


Area Performance
Emerging Corridors Challenge the Incumbents for Deal Flow
The most revealing story in area-level transaction data is not who leads — that pecking order is well established — but what is happening in positions three through five, where emerging master-planned communities are generating deal flow that rivals legacy premium submarkets.
Jumeirah Village Circle continues to anchor the volume table, functioning as the market's default liquidity engine. Its pricing discount to the marketwide median makes it the natural entry point for first-time investors and end-users alike, and its gross yield premium over higher-priced corridors reinforces the income thesis. Business Bay occupies a structurally different role: its per-sqm pricing sits well above the marketwide benchmark, yet it sustains near-institutional transaction depth, making it the clearest proxy for premium demand health. The key dynamic to watch in both areas is whether their volume share is expanding or contracting relative to the total market — if it expands during a period of aggregate volume compression, it signals flight-to-liquidity behaviour, which would be a cautionary indicator for smaller areas.
The actionable story sits in the tier just below. Majan generated transaction volumes that place it firmly in the top three for the most recent period, punching well above its historical weight class. At a 6.2% gross yield and mid-teen pricing per sqm, Majan offers a rare combination: affordable entry with yield materially above the marketwide level, supported by enough monthly transactions to give investors reasonable confidence in exit liquidity. Palm Deira presents a contrasting profile — its per-sqm pricing commands a substantial premium, closer to waterfront benchmarks than to affordable community pricing, yet it matched Majan's transaction count almost unit for unit. That pairing reveals two distinct buyer pools operating at similar velocity: value-oriented investors in Majan and premium off-plan buyers in Palm Deira betting on future waterfront delivery. Dubai South rounds out the mid-tier with comparable volume and pricing in the same band as Majan, reinforcing the thesis that affordable master-planned supply is the primary growth vector for transaction activity.
The horizontal bar chart makes the concentration dynamic immediately legible. The top corridor's volume lead over the fifth-ranked area is meaningful but not insurmountable, and the step-down between positions two through five is relatively gradual — a sign that deal flow is broadening rather than consolidating into a narrow set of incumbents. That broadening is structurally healthy: it reduces exit risk for investors in secondary corridors and suggests demand is deep enough to support multiple price tiers simultaneously.
Yield-seeking capital should focus on Majan and Dubai South, where pricing and rental returns offer the widest margin of safety at current levels. Appreciation-oriented buyers looking for post-delivery rerating should monitor Palm Deira's secondary-market transaction depth over Q2 — if resale volumes emerge alongside off-plan registrations, the area graduates from speculative pipeline play to investable market. That single data point will separate conviction from hope.


Yields
Yield Dispersion Reveals Clear Income Plays Above the Trend Line
The inverse relationship between entry price and gross yield is textbook in Dubai's current data — higher-priced corridors mechanically deliver lower yields unless rents outpace capital values — but the areas that deviate from this expected curve are where income investors should focus.
Jumeirah Village Circle sits conspicuously above the yield-price trend line. Its median rent of AED 1,149 per sqm generates the strongest gross yield among the market's high-volume corridors, meaningfully above the prevailing marketwide level. That premium persists despite enormous transaction throughput, which in most markets would arbitrage the gap away. The persistence suggests structural demand from renters who value the community's accessibility and density of amenities — a durable income stream rather than a pricing anomaly waiting to correct. For investors underwriting current cash flow above future price gains, this remains the clearest allocation.
Majan presents the second deviation worth examining. At AED 1,000 per sqm in median rent, it converts affordable entry pricing into a gross yield that sits comfortably above the marketwide benchmark. The risk here is thinner liquidity relative to the dominant corridor, but for investors willing to accept slightly longer hold periods, the yield pickup compensates.
Business Bay occupies the opposite end of the scatter. Its premium pricing compresses gross yield closer to the marketwide level despite strong absolute rents of AED 1,595 per sqm — the highest among the areas with published rental data. Investors here are implicitly underwriting capital appreciation: they accept a lower current income return because they believe the price trajectory will deliver total returns that justify the entry cost. That bet is defensible in a corridor with institutional-grade deal flow and central positioning, but it requires the annual appreciation trend to hold. If price growth continues decelerating toward low single digits, the total-return calculus narrows considerably.
Dubai South trades in a similar price band to Majan but lacks published yield data for the current period, making a direct comparison incomplete. The scatter chart will place it by price alone — investors should wait for rental data to confirm whether its yield profile aligns with its affordable-entry peers or lags due to lower rental demand in a still-maturing location.
Palm Deira presents the same data gap: high entry pricing with no rental benchmarks yet available. Without yield data, any characterisation of its income profile would be speculative. The chart will position it on the price axis as one of the market's most expensive corridors, but the vertical dimension remains undefined until rental activity matures.
The prescriptive framework is straightforward. Income-seeking investors should target Jumeirah Village Circle for its combination of yield outperformance and liquidity, or Majan for a higher-yield entry at the cost of thinner trading volume. Appreciation-oriented capital belongs in Business Bay, where the yield discount is the price of admission to a premium growth corridor. If the Q2 price print shows annual appreciation compressing further, the relative attractiveness of income plays over appreciation bets widens — watch that single data point to calibrate allocation between the two strategies.


Rental Market
Rental Gradient Narrows as Mid-Tier Areas Close the Gap on Premium Corridors
The rent gradient across Dubai's highest-volume corridors is compressing in a way that reshapes the affordability map. Business Bay anchors the premium tier, while Jumeirah Village Circle and Majan occupy the mid-tier band at materially lower rental rates. The horizontal bar chart makes the structural story clear: the distance between the top-rented corridor and the mid-tier is not a smooth continuum but a visible step function, with Business Bay standing apart and the affordable corridors clustering together at roughly two-thirds or less of that premium level.
What matters more than the ranking is how the gap is behaving. Marketwide median rents have been retreating on both a monthly and annual basis, but the pressure is not evenly distributed. Premium corridors like Business Bay carry higher absolute rents that are more exposed to new-contract repricing — tenants at these levels have substitution options in neighbouring areas that did not exist three years ago. Mid-tier corridors, by contrast, benefit from structural demand: population growth, visa reforms, and corporate relocations funnel a large share of new residents into the AED 1,000 to AED 1,200 per sqm rental band, where Jumeirah Village Circle and Majan sit. If premium rents soften faster than mid-tier rents hold, the gradient compresses further, and mid-tier landlords retain pricing power longer than headline market statistics suggest.
The more consequential dynamic is the widening gap between rental growth and sales-price growth. Annual appreciation in the sales market still outpaces annual rental movement, meaning the sales side is repricing faster than the leasing side can follow. For landlords, this divergence signals that current rental contracts are not keeping pace with replacement-cost pricing. For buyers underwriting rental income, the implication is that near-term yield compression has a rental-market cause, not just a capital-value cause.
New completions add a supply-side dimension that generic rent analysis often ignores. Areas with heavy recent handovers inject rental inventory as developers and early investors list unsold or unoccupied units. Majan, which has seen substantial off-plan activity, faces this dynamic directly — rental supply could outpace tenant absorption in the near term even as sales sentiment holds firm.
Investors targeting rental income should watch one signal above all others: whether mid-tier rents in Jumeirah Village Circle and Majan stabilise or continue declining in Q2. Stabilisation would confirm that the gradient compression is demand-driven and sustainable. A further decline exceeding the premium-tier pace would suggest supply saturation in the affordable band, making entry timing critical for income-focused buyers.


Price Distribution
Price Spread Nearly Doubles Between Mid-Market and Premium Corridors
Dubai's residential price distribution is not a bell curve — it is a bifurcated market where area selection alone can double per-sqm exposure. The boxplot reveals two distinct pricing clusters rather than a smooth continuum. A mid-market band groups corridors like Jumeirah Village Circle, Majan, and Dubai South within a narrow range, while a premium tier anchored by Palm Deira and Business Bay sits at roughly twice that level. This structural bimodality means the interquartile range overstates true within-segment dispersion; investors comparing across the full market are really choosing between two different asset classes dressed as one.
The shape of this distribution carries a clear portfolio implication. Within the mid-market cluster, per-sqm pricing varies by only a few hundred dirhams, meaning area rotation among affordable corridors adds negligible price risk. At the premium end, the gap between Business Bay and Palm Deira is more meaningful, reflecting divergent buyer profiles — established urban core versus emerging waterfront off-plan. Neither premium corridor qualifies as a statistical outlier; both sustain transaction volumes high enough to confirm they belong to a structural upper tier rather than representing episodic spikes.
For portfolio construction, this distribution defines the regime: area selection IS the investment decision, but only at the inter-tier level. Choosing between mid-market corridors is a yield and liquidity decision, not a pricing one. Choosing between tiers is a capital allocation decision that determines whether the portfolio leans toward income generation or capital appreciation. The boxplot's whiskers show no distressed micro-markets falling below the mid-market floor, which suggests the affordable end has not softened enough to create deep-value entry points. If Q2 2026 data shows the premium tier's median pulling further away from mid-market pricing, that divergence would confirm a widening wealth segmentation requiring explicit tier-based allocation — watch whether the inter-tier gap exceeds a factor of two in the next print.


Developer Landscape
Volume Players Face the Stress Test as Absorption Slows
The current volume downturn exposes a fundamental tension in Dubai's developer ecosystem: throughput-dependent business models need sustained sell-out velocity to protect margins, and that velocity is now under pressure. The horizontal bar chart ranks developers by transaction count, but the more useful read is segmenting them by how they make money — and which model is most vulnerable in a decelerating quarter.
Developers concentrated in Jumeirah Village Circle, Majan, and Dubai South operate throughput-driven strategies, pricing in the mid-teens per sqm to maximise absorption across a broad buyer base. This model thrives when monthly transaction volumes are elevated, but when aggregate activity contracts as sharply as it did in the latest period, these developers face a binary choice: hold pricing and accept slower sell-through, or offer incentives that erode already-thin margins. The risk is acute because their corridors compete directly with each other on price, leaving little room for differentiation beyond payment plan flexibility. Investors watching this segment should monitor whether any mid-market developer begins extending post-handover payment terms beyond 36 months — that would signal inventory stress before headline prices move.
At the premium end, developers active in Palm Deira and branded residence projects operate margin-driven models where each transaction carries substantially higher revenue per unit. Their exposure to the volume slowdown is structurally lower because they never relied on throughput economics — but their risk is different. Premium off-plan demand has held up, yet if appreciation expectations cool further, the pipeline of ultra-luxury launches risks saturating a thinner buyer pool. Savills notes that branded residences are surging across the Middle East as Dubai and Abu Dhabi lead regional demand5, which suggests the premium pipeline is expanding even as aggregate volumes contract — a divergence worth tracking closely.
The strategically interesting middle ground belongs to developers straddling moderate pricing with respectable volume — those active in corridors like Business Bay, where per-sqm levels sit well above mid-market but transaction depth remains substantial. These developers can pivot toward either buyer segment as conditions shift, offering premium finishes at mid-tier price points or repositioning units as income-generating assets. Their dual-market appeal makes them the most resilient business model in a transitional period.
Given the current regime of contracting volume alongside relatively stable pricing, throughput-dependent developers in the AED 15,000 to 17,000 per sqm band carry the most near-term exposure. If the next two monthly prints fail to recover meaningfully, expect these operators to introduce aggressive incentive structures. Premium developers are best positioned to weather a soft quarter without adjusting strategy. The falsifiable signal: if any top-five volume developer launches a project priced more than 5% below their trailing six-month average per sqm in the same corridor, it confirms that the absorption slowdown has breached pricing discipline.


Market Outlook
April and May Data Will Decide Whether This Is a Pause or a Pivot
The central question for Q3 2026 is whether the volume contraction and rental softness that characterised the first quarter represent a seasonal dip or the beginning of a structural downshift. The base case leans toward the former. Structural demand drivers remain intact: government-backed homeownership initiatives continue to feed first-time buyers into the pipeline2, branded and premium off-plan product still attracts capital at price points well above the mid-market band5, and the regulatory environment is evolving in ways that favour longer-duration holders over speculative flippers7. These forces do not disappear in a single soft quarter.
The realistic expectation through Q3 2026 is that transaction volumes recover toward the trailing twelve-month average without fully closing the year-on-year gap. Pricing per sqm is likely to drift sideways rather than accelerate — the era of double-digit annual appreciation is behind us, and the market is transitioning into a regime where mid-single-digit annual growth is the ceiling absent a new catalyst. For income investors, the more actionable variable is rental trajectory: if rents stabilise or edge higher by the end of Q2, yield compression halts and corridors offering above-market returns regain their relative attractiveness. If rents continue to slide, even the highest-yielding corridors will see their income advantage erode toward the marketwide average.
The tail risk to watch sits on the supply side. Multiple developers remain active across the mid-market pricing band, and a sustained volume drought would pressure at least one major player to cut launch pricing to maintain sell-through velocity. That scenario — visible through any top-five developer pricing a new project materially below their recent trailing average — would signal genuine distress rather than cyclical softness and would warrant a defensive reallocation away from off-plan exposure.
The allocation framework is clear: income-oriented capital belongs in corridors where yields remain meaningfully above the marketwide level, while appreciation-focused buyers should wait for confirmation that year-on-year pricing growth holds above three percent in Q3 2026 before adding exposure. The single most important data print is the next two months of transaction volume — if those readings narrow the year-on-year deficit to within fifteen percent of prior-year levels, the consolidation thesis holds and the market remains investable at current valuations.
The most consequential anomaly in the current data is the divergence between volume and pricing — transactions contracted sharply while per-sqm values barely moved. In a typical correction, these two metrics fall in tandem. Their decoupling suggests either that sellers are anchored to peak-era expectations and refusing to discount, or that genuine demand persists but buyers are pausing for macro clarity. Which interpretation proves correct will become visible by Q3 2026: if listings inventory climbs more than 15% while transaction counts remain suppressed, the anchor-bias reading wins and price concessions follow.
A second anomaly worth monitoring is the rental compression that outpaced the sales-side adjustment. Rents corrected far more aggressively than capital values, which is unusual in a market where lease renewals typically lag. One plausible catalyst is the wave of new handovers flooding mid-market corridors with available stock. If Q2 rental prints stabilise, yield spreads across the top corridors will re-expand and reduce the pressure on income-oriented allocations.
Third, premium off-plan corridors sustained volumes even as the broader market pulled back — a pattern consistent with structural rather than speculative demand, reinforced by the permanent-residency incentive layer now embedded in buyer motivation7. The catalyst to watch: developer pricing discipline. Any visible discount in new launches would signal that even premium demand has limits, and investors should treat that as a regime-change confirmation rather than a buying opportunity.
Key Figures
| Metric | Mar 2026 | MoM | YoY | Feb 2026 | MoM | YoY | Jan 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transactions | 8,946 | -33.6% | -27.9% | 13,468 | -6.2% | +7.9% | 14,357 |
| Total Value (AED) | 18.7B | -36.5% | -33.0% | 29.4B | -13.9% | +7.8% | 34.1B |
| Median Price per sqm (AED) | 18,504 | -1.9% | +5.0% | 18,862 | -2.3% | +12.6% | 19,297 |
| Median Rent per sqm (AED) | 1,071 | -12.0% | -3.6% | 1,218 | +4.0% | +6.6% | 1,171 |
| Gross Yield (%) | 5.8 | -67 bp | -51 bp | 6.5 | +39 bp | -36 bp | 6.1 |
MoM: month-over-month change · YoY: same month, prior year
